A process cannot be rated at "Capability Level 3" if it fails "Capability Level 2." Fix your summary formulas by adding an IF condition:
Early iterations of COBIT 2019 Excel tools had issues with formula accuracy, particularly when mapping design factors to the 40 core processes. The versions ensure that: Weighted calculations for capability levels are accurate.
Before evaluating the tools, it is essential to understand what exactly you are measuring. Unlike its predecessors, COBIT 2019 does not use the old Process Assessment Model (PAM) found in COBIT 5. Instead, it aligns with the , which ISACA acquired in 2016. This shift marked a significant evolution in the assessment approach.
The process is planned, monitored, and adjusted. Results are specified and achieved. cobit 2019 maturity assessment tool xls 2021 fixed
I can provide specific scoring examples or guide you through adjusting the design factors. Share public link
Are you using this tool for an , external compliance certificate , or general process improvement ?
These tabs contain the 40 objectives broken down by their process practices. Users score individual practices based on achievement levels: 0% to 15% achievement. P (Partially Achieved): 15% to 50% achievement. L (Largely Achieved): 50% to 85% achievement. F (Fully Achieved): 85% to 100% achievement. 3. Dashboard and Visualization Hub A process cannot be rated at "Capability Level
By utilizing a vetted, mathematically corrected tool like the COBIT 2019 Maturity Assessment Tool XLS, organizations can demystify complex IT governance requirements, align technology investments with corporate strategy, and establish a clear path toward operational maturity.
The process achieves its purpose but lacks structured planning.
The primary purposes of this Excel-based assessment tool are: Unlike its predecessors, COBIT 2019 does not use
A critical step in implementing this framework is measuring your current capabilities. This guide explores how to leverage the to evaluate, benchmark, and improve your IT governance ecosystem. Understanding COBIT 2019 Capability and Maturity Models
The COBIT 2019 Maturity Assessment Tool Excel (2021 fixed version) represents a valuable grassroots correction of a flawed yet widely used governance instrument. It demonstrates the power of practitioner communities in refining formal frameworks. However, its spreadsheet foundation imposes inherent limits: fragility, single-user bias, and lack of advanced analytics. For small-to-medium enterprises or initial assessments, it remains a pragmatic choice—provided users understand its logic and manually verify outputs. As EGIT becomes more data-driven, the next frontier is not a better Excel sheet, but a lightweight, auditable, collaborative assessment engine that retains the simplicity of a spreadsheet.
Select your process evaluation data and press Ctrl + T to convert the data into an official Excel Table. This ensures that any formulas referencing the data will automatically expand if you add new rows or processes. Step 2: Repair the Scoring Logic Ensure your scoring matrix uses the official COBIT ratings: (Not achieved): 0% to 15% P (Partially achieved): 15% to 50% A (Largely achieved): 50% to 85% F (Fully achieved): 85% to 100%
If your company strategy leans heavily on innovation, rank that drive high.
If you are using a modified version of the toolkit and suspect a calculation is broken, check for these common spreadsheet flaws: 1. SUMPRODUCT Errors in Design Factor Aggregations